House passes bill to bar Trump from military force against Iran


Iran announced Sunday it will increase its uranium enrichment to an unspecified level beyond the terms of its 2015 nuclear deal with world powers, furthering heightening tensions between Tehran and the U.S. (July 7)

WASHINGTON – The House approved a measure Friday that would bar President Donald Trump from launching a military strike against Iran, setting up a confrontation with the White House over the administration’s aggressive stance toward Tehran.

The House proposal – which was added to a sweeping $733 billion defense bill by a vote of 251-to-170 – would bar the Trump administration from using any federal funds for military force “in or against” the Islamic Republic, unless the president receives explicit congressional approval for a strike.

Trump nearly bombed Iran last month after Tehran shot down a U.S. military surveillance drone. Although the president called off the strike at the last minute, he has since threatened Iran with “obliteration” and warned that the U.S. would use “overwhelming force” if it attacked American assets or personnel.

Speaking to reporters on Friday, Trump said Iran was treading on very dangerous territory. Iran if you’re listening, you better be careful.”

More: House votes to end US role in Yemen, poised to block Trump from launching Iran strike

More: Iranian ships tried to block British oil tanker in Persian Gulf

Democrats say a war with Iran would be a prolonged and disastrous conflict – precisely the kind of “endless war” that Trump campaigned against in 2016. Some Republicans also fear that another war in the Middle East would be a terrible mistake, and there’s bipartisan concern that Congress has ceded too much of its war powers to the president in recent years. 

“This is the only way to stop Trump from starting another costly war,” said Rep. Ro Khanna, a California Democrat and a lead sponsor of the measure. “This is how we democratize our foreign policy and put an end to unconstitutional wars.”

He authored the amendment with Florida Republican Matt Gaetz, who hailed its passage as in line with Trump‘s pledge to avoid far-flung military conflicts.

“This amendment affirms what President Trump knows and believes: unfocused, unconstitutional, unending wars in the Middle East make America weaker, not stronger,” Gaetz said last month when he and Khanna introduced the amendment.  

More: Iran begins uranium enrichment beyond limit set by 2015 nuclear deal in latest violation

The GOP-held Senate rejected a similar proposal last month as that chamber debated its defense authorization bill. Many Senate Republicans warned that restricting Trump’s military options would be a dangerous step at a time when Iran has allegedly threatened U.S. assets in the region.

“Bottom line, this amendment will give comfort to our enemy, who has the blood of Americans on their hands — from the Marine barracks bombing to the Iraq War — and who continues to hold American hostages to this day,” Rep. Michael McCaul, R-Tx., the top Republican on the House Foreign Affairs Committee, said during Thursday’s debate. 

The Iran vote came a day after the House approved another limit on Trump‘s foreign policy: an amendment that would force the administration to end U.S. military support for Saudi Arabia’s military operations in Yemen.

The twin legislative actions represent a new level of congressional push back against Trump‘s foreign policy, as Democrats use their House majority to rebuke the president over his aggressive stance toward Iran and his cozy ties with Saudi Arabia.

Trump has already vetoed a stand-alone bill to end the U.S. role in Yemen. He argued it was “an unnecessary, dangerous attempt” to weaken his constitutional power.  

Republicans in Congress have also said that limiting U.S. involvement in Yemen would give Iran a green light to spread its influence across the region. The civil war in Yemen is essentially a proxy battle between Saudi Arabia and Iran, which is backing Houthi rebels who overthrew Yemen’s government more than four years ago.

More: Like what you’re reading? Download the USA TODAY app for more

Read or Share this story:

Show More
Back to top button

Pin It on Pinterest

Share This

Share this post with your friends!